U.S. Department of Labor
Employment and Training Administration
Office of Foreign Labor Certification
Frequently Asked Questions
H
-
1B, H
-
1B1, and E
-
3 Programs
1.
In circumstances where the Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics
cannot produce leveled wages for a specific geographic area and
occupational code due to statistical limitations in the Occupational
Employment Statistics (OES) wage dat
a, the OFLC Online Wage Library
displays “N/A” for each wage level and the OFLC Nation
al Prevailing Wage
Center (NPWC
) assigns a standard default prevailing wage for these
occupations (e.g., $90 per hour or $187,
200
per year).
Since the NPWC
consistently
assigns the same default prevailing wage in these
circumstances, can the employer be permitted to enter on its own the
standard default prevailing wage and cite “OFLC Online Data Center” on
the LCA, ETA Form 9035/ 9035E?
Yes.
Where the OFLC Online Wage Li
brary displays “N/A” for each leveled
wage covering a specific geographic area and occupational code, the employer
is permitted, in lieu of obtaining a prevailing wage determination from the NPWC,
to enter the following information in Section G of the LCA,
ETA Form 9035/
9035E:
Item
Form Item
Example Entry on
ETA Form 9035/9035E
G.7
§
Agency which issued prevailing wage
“N/A”
G.7a
§
Prevailing wage tracking number
(if
applicable)
“N/A”
G.8
*
Wage level
Mark “N/A” indicating no leveled wages
are
available
G.9
*
Prevailing wage
Enter the standard or default prevailing
wage (e.g.,
“
$90
”
or
“
$187,
200
”
)
G.10
*
Per (choose only one)
Mark the appropriate unit of pay
(e.g.,
“
per hour
”
or
“
per year
”
)
G.11
*
Prevailing wage source (choose only
one)
“OES”
G.11a
*
Year source published
Enter the most recent OES data year
G.11b
§
If “OES” and NPC did not issue
prevailing wage OR “Other” in question
11, specify source:
“OFLC Online Data Center”
(*) form designation which indicates the field response is required
2
(§) form designation which indicates the field response is conditionally based on
a response provided in a required field
Posted July 31, 2015
Monday, August 31, 2015
Comments posted above will only appear in this blog post. Comments posted below will appear across all blog posts:
comments powered by Disqus
Thursday, August 27, 2015
H-2A Processing Statistics for FY 2015 YTD
1 Percent of complete H-2A applications resolved 30 days before the start date of
need. A complete H-2A application is defined as one containing all the documentation
(e.g., housing inspection report, workers’ compensation, recruitment report) necessary for
the OFLC Certifying Officer to issue a final determin
Comments posted above will only appear in this blog post. Comments posted below will appear across all blog posts:
comments powered by Disqus
Monday, August 24, 2015
Comments posted above will only appear in this blog post. Comments posted below will appear across all blog posts:
comments powered by Disqus
Friday, August 21, 2015
Update for DACA Recipients Who Received 3-Year Work Permits
From USCIS: USCIS has accounted for over 99 percent of the approximately 2,600 identified invalid work permits requiring return.
Twenty-two of the approximately 2,600 recipients failed to return their work permits or certify good cause for not doing so by the deadline of July 30, 2015. As a result, those 22 have been terminated from DACA.
The recall only applied to SOME individuals who received a card after the Feb. 16, 2015, court order. There are approximately 108,000 individuals who have valid 3-year DACA work permits and do not need to return them.
If you were affected by the recall and returned your invalid 3-year work permit, use Case Status Online to verify whether USCIS received your work permit.
Twenty-two of the approximately 2,600 recipients failed to return their work permits or certify good cause for not doing so by the deadline of July 30, 2015. As a result, those 22 have been terminated from DACA.
The recall only applied to SOME individuals who received a card after the Feb. 16, 2015, court order. There are approximately 108,000 individuals who have valid 3-year DACA work permits and do not need to return them.
If you were affected by the recall and returned your invalid 3-year work permit, use Case Status Online to verify whether USCIS received your work permit.
Comments posted above will only appear in this blog post. Comments posted below will appear across all blog posts:
comments powered by Disqus
Wednesday, August 19, 2015
Temporary Immigration Relief Measures Available for Individuals Affected by Typhoon Soudelor
From USCIS: On August 2, 2015, Typhoon Soudelor
caused extensive damage in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands (CNMI). USCIS reminds customers affected by Typhoon Soudelor
that certain U.S. immigration benefits or relief may be available to
them. USCIS understands that a natural disaster can affect an
individual’s ability to maintain lawful immigration status or obtain
certain other immigration benefits.
Eligible individuals may request or apply for temporary relief measures, including:
Eligible individuals may request or apply for temporary relief measures, including:
- A change or extension of nonimmigrant status for an individual currently in the United States, even when the request is filed after the authorized period of admission has expired;
- Extension or re-parole of individuals previously granted parole by USCIS;
- Expedited adjudication of employment authorization applications; and
- Assistance to lawful permanent residents (LPR) stranded overseas without immigration or travel documents, such as a Permanent Resident Card (Green Card). USCIS and the Department of State will coordinate on these matters when LPRs are stranded in a place that does not have a local USCIS office.
- Assistance to those who have not appeared for an interview or submitted required forms of evidence. You may show how the typhoon prevented you from appearing or submitting documents as required; or
- Assistance to those who have not been able to respond to a request for evidence (RFE) or notice of intent to deny (NOID). USCIS will extend the deadline for individuals to respond to RFEs or NOIDs by 30 days. This will apply to all RFEs and NOIDs with a deadline of August 2 through September 2, 2015. During this time, USCIS will not issue denials based on abandonment of an application or petition in the CNMI.
Comments posted above will only appear in this blog post. Comments posted below will appear across all blog posts:
comments powered by Disqus
Monday, August 17, 2015
October 2015 Visa Bulletin Predictions
For September 2015 Visa Bulletin, please click here: http://blog.mygcvisa.com/2015/08/september-2015-visa-bulletin.html
Please see October 2015 Visa Bulletin Predictions below (for both Family Based and Employment Based):
Quick Summary:
Family Based:
Please see October 2015 Visa Bulletin Predictions below (for both Family Based and Employment Based):
Quick Summary:
- EB1, EB4, EB 5: Current
- EB2 Rest Of World: Current
EB2 China: 0-3+ months
EB2 India: 0-2 months. Please see article 1. Also see article 2. - EB3 (ROW, Mexico): Either Current or around 4 weeks. Please see article.
EB3 China: 0-2+ months
EB3 India: 1-2 weeks
EB3 Philippines: 2-6+ weeks. Please see article. - FB categories: 1 to 12 weeks Please see article.
- F2A: 3-6 weeks. Please see article.
Family Based:
Family-Sponsored | All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed | CHINA- mainland born | INDIA | MEXICO | PHILIPPINES |
F1 | 15JAN08 | 15JAN08 | 15JAN08 | 01DEC94 | 01DEC00 |
F2A | 08APR14 | 08APR14 | 08APR14 | 08FEB14 | 08APR14 |
F2B | 22JAN09 | 22JAN09 | 22JAN09 | 15AUG95 | 08OCT04 |
F3 | 22MAY04 | 22MAY04 | 22MAY04 | 08JUN94 | 01OCT93 |
F4 | 22FEB03 | 22FEB03 | 22FEB03 | 01APR97 | 01APR92 |
Employment Based:
Comments posted above will only appear in this blog post. Comments posted below will appear across all blog posts:
comments powered by Disqus
Friday, August 14, 2015
September 2015 Visa Bulletin Analysis
For September 2015 Visa Bulletin, please click here: http://blog.mygcvisa.com/2015/08/september-2015-visa-bulletin.html
Please see below analysis of September 2015 Visa Bulletin:
EB1: All EB1 categories are current and should continue to remain current for fiscal year. Demand continues to be around 1050 every month (per the latest pending inventory released few days ago).
EB2 ROW: This category continues to remain current. Per the latest report, demand in EB2ROW has increased significantly (11,000+ for year 2014 alone). However, since it can get spillover from EB4/EB5 and EB1 categories, this category is expected to remain current for FY 2016.
EB2 China: EB2 China had a large retrogression in this visa bulletin. It retrogressed by nearly 8 years in this visa bulletin after moving 2.5 months in the last visa bulletin. It is likely to continue to move forward in the next few months.
EB2 India: As mentioned in earlier blog post, demand in EB2 ROW has increased significantly. This directly impacts the amount of spillover visa available to EB2 India category. Due to increase demand in EB2 ROW, the total supply has decreased significantly in this category. Because of this, this, DOS had to retrogress EB2 India by nearly 3 years.
In addition, there are applicants in EB2 who have not yet filed their application as well as applicants who will be porting from EB3 India to EB2 India.
Please see below analysis of September 2015 Visa Bulletin:
EB1: All EB1 categories are current and should continue to remain current for fiscal year. Demand continues to be around 1050 every month (per the latest pending inventory released few days ago).
EB2 ROW: This category continues to remain current. Per the latest report, demand in EB2ROW has increased significantly (11,000+ for year 2014 alone). However, since it can get spillover from EB4/EB5 and EB1 categories, this category is expected to remain current for FY 2016.
EB2 China: EB2 China had a large retrogression in this visa bulletin. It retrogressed by nearly 8 years in this visa bulletin after moving 2.5 months in the last visa bulletin. It is likely to continue to move forward in the next few months.
EB2 India: As mentioned in earlier blog post, demand in EB2 ROW has increased significantly. This directly impacts the amount of spillover visa available to EB2 India category. Due to increase demand in EB2 ROW, the total supply has decreased significantly in this category. Because of this, this, DOS had to retrogress EB2 India by nearly 3 years.
In addition, there are applicants in EB2 who have not yet filed their application as well as applicants who will be porting from EB3 India to EB2 India.
Comments posted above will only appear in this blog post. Comments posted below will appear across all blog posts:
comments powered by Disqus
Thursday, August 6, 2015
September 2015 Visa Bulletin
For August 2015 Visa Bulletin, please click here: http://blog.mygcvisa.com/2015/07/august-2015-visa-bulletin.html
September 2015 Visa Bulletin has been released (valid from September 1 to September 30 only). Please see below for more details.
Family Based:
Employment Based:
September 2015 Visa Bulletin has been released (valid from September 1 to September 30 only). Please see below for more details.
Family Based:
Family-Sponsored | All Chargeability Areas Except Those Listed | CHINA-mainland born | INDIA | MEXICO | PHILIPPINES |
F1 | 15DEC07 | 15DEC07 | 15DEC07 | 15NOV94 | 22OCT00 |
F2A | 01MAR14 | 01MAR14 | 01MAR14 | 01FEB14 | 01MAR14 |
F2B | 22DEC08 | 22DEC08 | 22DEC08 | 15JUL95 | 08SEP04 |
F3 | 08MAY04 | 08MAY04 | 08MAY04 | 22MAY94 | 15SEP93 |
F4 | 15JAN03 | 15JAN03 | 15JAN03 | 15MAR97 | 01MAR92 |
Employment Based:
Comments posted above will only appear in this blog post. Comments posted below will appear across all blog posts:
comments powered by Disqus
Monday, August 3, 2015
USCIS Seeks Comments on Proposed Expansion of Eligibility for Provisional Unlawful Presence Waivers
From USCIS: USCIS is seeking public comments on a
proposed rule that would expand eligibility for provisional waivers of
inadmissibility based on the accrual of unlawful presence. The proposed
rule would expand eligibility to all foreign nationals who are
statutorily eligible for an immigrant visa and for a waiver of
inadmissibility based on unlawful presence.
Read the notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal Register on July 22, 2015. The public has 60 days, until Sept. 21, 2015, to comment. To submit comments, follow the instructions in the notice.
The changes, proposed in the interests of family unity and to enhance customer service, would take effect on the date indicated in the final rule when the final rule is published in the Federal Register.
Currently, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) allows certain immediate relatives – specifically certain parents, spouses and children of U.S. citizens -- who are in the United States to request a provisional unlawful presence waiver before departing for consular processing of their immigrant visas.
The waiver currently is only available to those immediate relatives whose sole ground of inadmissibility would be unlawful presence under section 212(a)(9)(B)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act and who can demonstrate that the denial of the waiver would result in extreme hardship to their U.S. citizen spouse or parent.
Read the notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal Register on July 22, 2015. The public has 60 days, until Sept. 21, 2015, to comment. To submit comments, follow the instructions in the notice.
The changes, proposed in the interests of family unity and to enhance customer service, would take effect on the date indicated in the final rule when the final rule is published in the Federal Register.
Currently, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) allows certain immediate relatives – specifically certain parents, spouses and children of U.S. citizens -- who are in the United States to request a provisional unlawful presence waiver before departing for consular processing of their immigrant visas.
The waiver currently is only available to those immediate relatives whose sole ground of inadmissibility would be unlawful presence under section 212(a)(9)(B)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act and who can demonstrate that the denial of the waiver would result in extreme hardship to their U.S. citizen spouse or parent.
Comments posted above will only appear in this blog post. Comments posted below will appear across all blog posts:
comments powered by Disqus
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)